Skip to main content

Daughters have equal birthright to inherit property: Supreme Court

DAUGHTERS HAVE EQUAL BIRTHRIGHT TO INHERIT PROPERTY


The amendment to the Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act1956, which came into force from September 9, 2005 as Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, conferred the status of coparcener to a daughter born before or after the amendment in the same manner as a son.  After this, an issue was raised regarding the retrospective effect of the amendment, means, whether this amendment is effective if the parent/father died before it has come into force.


In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court ruled that as per the Hindu Succession (Amendment)Act, 2005 daughters would have equal Coparcenary rights in Hindu Undivided Family properties even if they were born before the 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and regardless of whether their father coparcener had died before the amendment, i.e. it would have retrospective effect.


Before the amendment, daughters were entitled only to a share of their father’s inheritance and weren’t independent coparceners like sons. From September 9, 2005, daughters living or born to any coparcener of a joint family were deemed to be a coparcener and would be conferred equal rights and liabilities under the law. 


A bench of Justice Arun Mishra, Justice S Abdul Nazeer and Justice MR Shah held that the provisions contained in substituted Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 confer status of coparcener on the daughter born before or after amendment in the same manner as son with same rights and liabilities.


The Apex Court held that the  rights can be claimed by the daughter born earlier with effect from 9.9.2005 with savings as provided in Section 6(1) as to the disposition or alienation, partition or testamentary disposition which had taken place before 20th day of December, 2004.

Three judge bench also held  that, since the right in coparcenary is by birth, it is not necessary that father coparcener should be living as on 9.9.2005.

 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ARTICLE 370 - A brief note

ARTICLE 370- A BRIEF NOTE  Written By : Ms. Ankita Rana  Sr. Executive Law, BHEL  Article 370 of the Constitution of India, 1949 accords a special status to the State of Jammu & Kashmir. It limits the application of the provisions of the Constitution of India to the State of Jammu & Kashmir, (except Article 1 and Article 370 itself) and permits the state to draft its own Constitution. It restricts Parliament’s legislative powers in respect of J&K.  HISTORY OF ACCESSION OF J & K TO INDIA In order to understand Article 370, it is important to first understand the legislative history behind the provision. The provision was introduced in the Constitution as unlike other princely states, special conditions existed in the State of Jammu & Kashmir as follows: • India was at war with Pakistan and there was a cease fire agreed operating at the relevant time; • The internal condition in the state of J & K was still unusual and ...

NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS (NRC)

The  National Register of Citizens (NRC)  is a register maintained by the Government of India containing names & certain relevant information for identification of Indian citizens of Assam state. The register was initially, specifically made for Assam state. However, on 20th November 2019, Home Minister Amit Shah declared during a Parliamentary Session that the register would be extended to the entire country. The register was first prepared after the 1951 Census of India and since then it has not been updated until recently. Assam has become the first state in India where the updating of the NRC is being taken up to include the names of those persons whose names appeared in the NRC of 1951 and is still alive; and/or of their presently living descendants who have permanent residence within the state. The updated final NRC was released on August 31, 2019 with over 1.9 million applicants failing to make it to the list. PURPOSE OF NRC The purpose of NRC update i...

PRESIDENT’S RULE

PRESIDENT’S RULE  In layman’s term  President's Rule  is the suspension of state government and imposition of direct central government rule in a state. Article 356 of Indian Constitution deals with imposition of President’s Rule over a State of India. If a State Government is unable to function according to constitutional provisions, the Central government can take direct control of the state machinery. Executive authority is exercised through the centrally appointed governor, who has the authority to appoint other administrators to assist them.  During president's rule, the Council of Ministers is dissolved, vacating the office of Chief Minister. Furthermore, the Vidhan Sabha is either prorogued or dissolved, necessitating a new election.  The Governor is an appointee of the President and thus, effectively, a functionary of the Union Government.  S. R. Bommai v. Union of India   was a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court wher...